Skip to content

Lesson 6: Force Analysis and Mechanism Synthesis

🎯 Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  1. Analyze static force transmission through complex planar mechanisms
  2. Apply virtual work principles for force and torque calculations
  3. Size actuators based on mechanism force requirements and mechanical advantage
  4. Synthesize complete mechanisms using integrated position, velocity, and force analysis

🔧 Real-World System Problem: Multi-DOF Robotic Manipulator System

The ultimate challenge in planar mechanism design is creating multi-DOF robotic manipulators that can handle complex tasks with precision, efficiency, and reliability. From surgical robots requiring nanometer precision to industrial robots moving heavy payloads at high speeds, the design process integrates all aspects of planar mechanics: joint analysis, position/velocity relationships, dynamic forces, and force transmission optimization.

System Challenge: Complete Robot Design Integration

Critical Engineering Problem:

  • How do we determine actuator requirements for complex manipulation tasks?
  • What mechanism geometry provides optimal force transmission throughout the workspace?
  • How do we balance payload capacity, precision, speed, and energy efficiency?
  • Can we design robots that adapt their mechanical advantage based on task requirements?

🤖 Advanced Robotic Manipulator Challenge

Design Goal: Create a 3-DOF planar robotic manipulator capable of handling 10 kg payloads with millimeter precision while minimizing actuator size and energy consumption.

Key Requirements:

  • Payload Capacity: 10 kg anywhere in workspace
  • Positioning Precision: \pm1.0 mm repeatability
  • Workspace: 1.2m × 0.8m rectangular envelope
  • Speed: 2 m/s maximum end-effector velocity
  • Energy Efficiency: Optimize actuator sizing for minimum power consumption

Why Force Analysis and Synthesis Matter

Complete mechanism design requires:

  • Force Analysis: Understanding load transmission and actuator requirements
  • Mechanical Advantage: Optimizing force/torque relationships throughout workspace
  • Actuator Selection: Right-sizing motors and drives for performance and efficiency
  • System Integration: Balancing all design requirements for optimal performance

📚 Fundamental Theory: Static Force Analysis and Mechanism Synthesis

To design complete robotic systems, we need systematic methods for analyzing forces and synthesizing optimal mechanisms.

What is Static Force Analysis?

Static force analysis determines the forces and torques required at mechanism inputs to balance external loads applied to the mechanism.

⚖️ Static Force Analysis Definition

Static Force Analysis answers the fundamental question:

“What input forces and torques are required to maintain equilibrium when external loads are applied to the mechanism?”

Key Outputs:

  • Joint Reaction Forces: Forces transmitted through mechanism joints
  • Actuator Torques: Required motor torques for given loads
  • Mechanical Advantage: Force amplification or reduction ratios
  • System Efficiency: Power transmission effectiveness

Virtual Work Principle: The Universal Method

The principle of virtual work provides the most powerful and general approach to force analysis.

🔧 Virtual Work Principle

Principle Statement: For a mechanism in equilibrium, the virtual work done by all forces through any virtual displacement is zero.

Mathematical Expression:

Where:

  • = External forces
  • = Virtual linear displacements
  • = Applied torques (including actuator torques)
  • = Virtual angular displacements

Power: Relates input and output forces through kinematic relationships without needing to find joint reactions.

Mechanical Advantage Through Force Analysis

Mechanical advantage quantifies how mechanisms amplify or reduce forces:

  1. Force Mechanical Advantage

  2. Torque Mechanical Advantage

  3. Velocity Relationship

  4. Power Conservation

🎯 System Application: 3-DOF Robot Force Analysis

Let’s analyze and design a complete 3-DOF robotic manipulator system.

Robot Configuration Design

System Architecture:

  • Joint 1: Base rotation (shoulder) - 360° rotation capability
  • Joint 2: Upper arm elevation (shoulder pitch) - \pm90° range
  • Joint 3: Forearm positioning (elbow) - \pm150° range
  • Link Lengths: L₁ = 0.4m, L₂ = 0.6m, L₃ = 0.2m
  • Target Payload: 10 kg at end-effector

Step 1: Workspace and Configuration Analysis

Click to reveal workspace analysis
  1. Forward Kinematics:

    End-effector position:

  2. Workspace Verification:

    • Maximum reach: m
    • Minimum reach: m
    • Workspace envelope: Annular region 0.4m to 1.2m radius
  3. Configuration Selection:

    • Elbow-up configuration for maximum stiffness
    • Joint limits prevent singularities and collisions
    • Redundancy available for obstacle avoidance

Step 2: Static Force Analysis Using Virtual Work

Click to reveal force analysis calculations

Velocity Jacobian:

The Jacobian matrix relates joint velocities to end-effector velocity:

Jacobian Elements:

Step 3: Actuator Sizing and Selection

🔋 Actuator Sizing Results

Motor Requirements Analysis:

Joint 1 (Base Rotation):

  • Peak Torque: 15 N⋅m (for acceleration, not static load)
  • Continuous Torque: 5 N⋅m (positioning and dynamic loads)
  • Speed: 180°/s (π rad/s) maximum
  • Selected Motor: 1 kW servo motor with 5:1 gearbox

Joint 2 (Shoulder):

  • Peak Torque: 90 N⋅m (including safety factor and dynamics)
  • Continuous Torque: 80 N⋅m (static payload + arm weight)
  • Speed: 90°/s (π/2 rad/s) maximum
  • Selected Motor: 2.5 kW servo motor with 20:1 gearbox

Joint 3 (Elbow):

  • Peak Torque: 25 N⋅m (including safety factor)
  • Continuous Torque: 20 N⋅m (static payload)
  • Speed: 180°/s (π rad/s) maximum
  • Selected Motor: 1.5 kW servo motor with 10:1 gearbox

System Power: 5 kW total (motors sized for worst-case conditions)

🛠️ Advanced Force Analysis Techniques

Dynamic Force Analysis

For high-speed operation, dynamic forces become significant:

  1. Inertial Force Calculation

    • Link masses and inertias contribute to joint torques
    • Acceleration-dependent forces add to static requirements
    • Use Newton-Euler or Lagrangian methods
  2. Coupling Effects

    • Joint motions interact through mechanism geometry
    • Centrifugal and Coriolis forces appear at high speeds
    • Dynamic analysis requires computational tools
  3. Actuator Sizing Impact

    • Peak torques may be 2-5× static requirements
    • Motor selection must account for acceleration capabilities
    • Energy consumption increases significantly with speed

Advanced Synthesis Techniques

Mechanism synthesis is the process of designing mechanism geometry to meet specified performance requirements:

🎯 Synthesis Problem Types

Type Synthesis: What type of mechanism should be used?

  • Number and types of links and joints
  • Kinematic structure and topology
  • DOF requirements and constraints

Dimensional Synthesis: What are the optimal link lengths and joint locations?

  • Workspace requirements and shape
  • Force transmission optimization
  • Singularity avoidance and dexterity

Combined Synthesis: Integrate type and dimensional synthesis

  • Multi-objective optimization problems
  • Performance trade-offs and compromises
  • Real-world constraints and manufacturing limits

Optimization-Based Design

Modern mechanism design uses computational optimization:

Common Optimization Objectives:

Minimize Actuator Size:

Maximize Stiffness:

Minimize Energy Consumption:

Maximize Workspace:

📊 Computational Force Analysis and Synthesis

Modern Analysis Tools

Multibody Dynamics

Adams/MSC Software:

  • Complete force and motion analysis
  • Flexible body modeling capabilities
  • Control system co-simulation

MATLAB Robotics Toolbox:

  • Specialized robot analysis functions
  • Forward/inverse kinematics and dynamics
  • Path planning and control integration

Optimization Platforms

ANSYS optiSLang:

  • Multi-disciplinary design optimization
  • Robust design and uncertainty quantification
  • CAE process automation

ModeFrontier:

  • Multi-objective optimization platform
  • Design space exploration tools
  • Integration with CAD/CAE systems

Robot-Specific Tools

ROS (Robot Operating System):

  • Open-source robot development framework
  • MoveIt motion planning and control
  • Gazebo simulation environment

CasADi/ACADO:

  • Optimal control and trajectory optimization
  • Real-time capable implementations
  • Advanced robotics research tools

Programming Complete Robot Analysis

Python Example for Robot Force Analysis:

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import minimize
class PlanarRobot3DOF:
def __init__(self, L1, L2, L3):
self.L = [L1, L2, L3] # Link lengths
def forward_kinematics(self, theta):
"""Calculate end-effector position"""
theta1, theta2, theta3 = theta
x = (self.L[0] * np.cos(theta1) +
self.L[1] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
y = (self.L[0] * np.sin(theta1) +
self.L[1] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
return np.array([x, y])
def jacobian(self, theta):
"""Calculate velocity Jacobian matrix"""
theta1, theta2, theta3 = theta
# Partial derivatives
J11 = -(self.L[0] * np.sin(theta1) +
self.L[1] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
J12 = -(self.L[1] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
J13 = -self.L[2] * np.sin(theta1 + theta2 + theta3)
J21 = (self.L[0] * np.cos(theta1) +
self.L[1] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
J22 = (self.L[1] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2) +
self.L[2] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2 + theta3))
J23 = self.L[2] * np.cos(theta1 + theta2 + theta3)
return np.array([[J11, J12, J13],
[J21, J22, J23]])
def static_torques(self, theta, force):
"""Calculate required joint torques for given end-effector force"""
J = self.jacobian(theta)
tau = J.T @ force
return tau
def manipulability(self, theta):
"""Calculate manipulability measure"""
J = self.jacobian(theta)
return np.sqrt(np.linalg.det(J @ J.T))
# Robot parameters
robot = PlanarRobot3DOF(L1=0.4, L2=0.6, L3=0.2)
# Payload parameters
payload_mass = 10.0 # kg
g = 9.81 # m/s²
force_gravity = np.array([0, -payload_mass * g]) # Downward force
# Analyze workspace and torque requirements
theta_range = np.linspace(-np.pi/2, np.pi/2, 50)
max_torques = []
manipulability_values = []
for theta1 in theta_range:
for theta2 in theta_range:
for theta3 in theta_range:
theta = [theta1, theta2, theta3]
# Check if configuration is reachable
try:
torques = robot.static_torques(theta, force_gravity)
manip = robot.manipulability(theta)
max_torques.append(np.max(np.abs(torques)))
manipulability_values.append(manip)
except np.linalg.LinAlgError:
# Skip singular configurations
continue
# Results analysis
print(f"Maximum required torque: {np.max(max_torques):.1f} N⋅m")
print(f"Average torque requirement: {np.mean(max_torques):.1f} N⋅m")
print(f"Best manipulability: {np.max(manipulability_values):.3f}")
print(f"Worst manipulability: {np.min(manipulability_values):.3f}")
# Visualization
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 4))
plt.subplot(1, 3, 1)
plt.hist(max_torques, bins=30)
plt.xlabel('Maximum Joint Torque (N⋅m)')
plt.ylabel('Frequency')
plt.title('Torque Distribution')
plt.subplot(1, 3, 2)
plt.hist(manipulability_values, bins=30)
plt.xlabel('Manipulability')
plt.ylabel('Frequency')
plt.title('Manipulability Distribution')
plt.subplot(1, 3, 3)
plt.scatter(max_torques, manipulability_values, alpha=0.6)
plt.xlabel('Maximum Joint Torque (N⋅m)')
plt.ylabel('Manipulability')
plt.title('Torque vs. Manipulability')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

🎯 Complete Design Case Study: Medical Assistance Robot

System Requirements and Specifications

Application: Surgical assistance robot for minimally invasive procedures

Performance Requirements:

  • Positioning Accuracy: \pm0.1 mm
  • Payload: 2 kg surgical instruments
  • Workspace: 300mm × 200mm × 150mm
  • Speed: 50 mm/s maximum (safety-critical application)
  • Force Feedback: 0.1 N resolution for haptic feedback

Design Synthesis Process

  1. Type Synthesis Decision

    • Selected 3-DOF RRR planar mechanism
    • Parallel kinematic alternative evaluated but rejected for workspace limitations
    • Serial configuration provides required reach and dexterity
  2. Dimensional Optimization

    • Link length optimization for workspace coverage
    • Minimization of joint torques throughout workspace
    • Singularity avoidance with 15° minimum distance from singular configurations
  3. Actuator Integration

    • High-resolution servo motors with harmonic drive gearboxes
    • Force sensors at each joint for safety and haptic feedback
    • Redundant position encoders for fault tolerance
  4. Validation and Testing

    • Prototype constructed and tested with medical advisory board
    • Accuracy validation using laser interferometry
    • Safety certification through extensive failure mode analysis

Performance Results

🏥 Medical Robot Design Results

Optimized System Performance:

Mechanical Design:

  • Link Lengths: L₁ = 200mm, L₂ = 150mm, L₃ = 100mm
  • Maximum Joint Torques: 15 N⋅m, 12 N⋅m, 8 N⋅m
  • Weight: 8.5 kg (lightweight for portability)
  • Stiffness: 2000 N/mm minimum throughout workspace

Performance Validation:

  • Positioning Accuracy: \pm0.05 mm (exceeded specification)
  • Repeatability: \pm0.02 mm (excellent consistency)
  • Force Resolution: 0.05 N (doubled sensitivity requirement)
  • Workspace Coverage: 98% of specified volume (excellent)

Clinical Impact:

  • 40% reduction in procedure time compared to manual methods
  • Improved precision reduces patient trauma and recovery time
  • Surgeon fatigue reduced through haptic assistance
  • Training time reduced through intuitive control interface

📋 Summary and Professional Integration

Complete Design Methodology

This lesson integrates all previous concepts into a systematic design approach:

  1. Requirements Analysis (Lesson 1: DOF and constraints)
  2. Kinematic Design (Lesson 2: Position analysis and workspace)
  3. Motion Optimization (Lesson 3: Velocity profiles and efficiency)
  4. Dynamic Analysis (Lesson 4: Acceleration and inertial forces)
  5. Actuation Design (Lesson 5: Motion programming and control)
  6. Force Analysis and Synthesis (Lesson 6: Complete system integration)

Professional Design Principles

Systems Integration

Philosophy: Consider all aspects simultaneously for optimal design Method: Iterative optimization balancing competing requirements Validation: Prototype testing confirms analytical predictions

Performance Optimization

Goal: Maximize performance while minimizing cost and complexity Tools: Multi-objective optimization and design space exploration Trade-offs: Balance precision, speed, payload, and energy efficiency

Robust Design

Challenge: Real-world variations in materials, manufacturing, and operation Solution: Design for tolerances and uncertainties Validation: Testing under varied conditions and degraded performance

Life-Cycle Considerations

Maintenance: Design for predictable wear and easy service Upgradability: Allow for technology improvements over time Sustainability: Consider environmental impact and end-of-life disposal

Course Learning Outcomes Achieved

Technical Mastery:

  1. Joint Analysis: Understanding DOF, constraints, and mobility
  2. Position Analysis: Solving kinematic equations and workspace design
  3. Velocity Analysis: Optimizing motion profiles and mechanical advantage
  4. Acceleration Analysis: Predicting dynamic forces and vibration
  5. Motion Programming: Designing optimal cam and motion profiles
  6. Force Analysis: Determining actuator requirements and force transmission

Professional Skills:

  1. Systems Thinking: Integrating multiple engineering disciplines
  2. Design Optimization: Balancing competing requirements and constraints
  3. Computational Tools: Using modern software for analysis and design
  4. Validation Methods: Confirming design performance through testing
  5. Industry Applications: Understanding real-world design challenges
  6. Communication: Presenting technical results to diverse audiences

Next Steps in Mechatronic System Design

Advanced Topics to Explore:

  • 3D Spatial Mechanisms: Extension to three-dimensional systems
  • Flexible Body Dynamics: Systems with elastic deformations
  • Control System Integration: Closed-loop motion and force control
  • Human-Robot Interaction: Safety and collaborative operation
  • Machine Learning Applications: Adaptive and learning systems
  • Micro/Nano Systems: MEMS and precision mechanisms

Professional Development:

  • Industry Internships: Gain hands-on experience with real systems
  • Research Projects: Explore cutting-edge applications and methods
  • Professional Societies: Join ASME, IEEE Robotics, or industry associations
  • Continuing Education: Stay current with evolving technology and methods
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Work with electrical, software, and biomedical engineers

The journey in planar mechanics and mechatronic system design is complete, but your application of these principles is just beginning. Use this foundation to create systems that improve human life, enhance productivity, and push the boundaries of what’s possible with mechatronics engineering.

Comments

© 2021-2025 SiliconWit. All rights reserved.