By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Whether it’s the engine in your car, the compressor in your air conditioning system, or the pump in a hydraulic system, crank-slider mechanisms are the workhorses of mechanical engineering. These systems convert rotational motion from motors into linear motion for pistons - but the devil is in the details of how velocity varies throughout the cycle.
Critical Engineering Questions:
⚡ High-Performance Engine Design Challenge
Design Goal: Optimize a crank-slider mechanism for maximum power density while minimizing vibration and stress.
Key Requirements:
Velocity analysis is crucial for:
To optimize our crank-slider system, we need systematic methods for analyzing velocity throughout the mechanism.
Velocity analysis determines the linear and angular velocities of all points and links in a mechanism when given the velocity of the input link.
🚀 Velocity Analysis Definition
Velocity Analysis answers the fundamental question:
“Given the input link velocity, how fast are all other points and links moving?”
Key Outputs:
Velocity polygons provide an intuitive graphical approach to velocity analysis.
📐 Velocity Polygon Principle
Fundamental Concept: The relative velocity between two points on the same rigid body is perpendicular to the line connecting those points.
Key Relationships:
Physical Meaning: Any point on a rigid body has velocity components due to translation of a reference point plus rotation about that point.
Instantaneous centers are points that have zero velocity at any given instant - the “instant centers of rotation.”
🎯 Instantaneous Center Theory
Definition: The instantaneous center (IC) is the point about which a body appears to rotate at any given instant.
Key Properties:
Velocity Relationship:
Let’s apply our velocity analysis methods to optimize a real crank-slider engine system.
System Specifications:
Define coordinate system:
Piston position equation:
Where φ is the connecting rod angle:
Simplified form (for l >> r):
Piston velocity by differentiation:
Simplified form:
At θ = 90° (TDC to BDC):
Finding Instantaneous Centers:
Crank IC: At crankshaft center (fixed pivot)
Connecting Rod IC: Intersection of perpendiculars to velocity vectors at rod ends
Piston IC: At infinity (pure translation)
IC Calculation:
Using IC for Velocity Analysis:
Connecting Rod Angular Velocity:
Piston Velocity:
Where
Method Comparison:
| Crank Angle | Analytical V_P | IC Method V_P | Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0° | 0 m/s | 0 m/s | 0% |
| 30° | -16.8 m/s | -16.9 m/s | 0.6% |
| 90° | -38.8 m/s | -38.8 m/s | 0% |
| 180° | 0 m/s | 0 m/s | 0% |
✅ Excellent agreement between methods validates analysis
🏍️ Motorcycle Engine Velocity Analysis Results
Key Performance Metrics:
Maximum Piston Speed: 38.8 m/s (at 90° crank angle) Average Piston Speed: 18.9 m/s (half of maximum) Speed Variation: Sinusoidal with secondary harmonic correction Mechanical Advantage: Varies from 0 to 1.37 throughout cycle
Design Implications:
For complex mechanisms, velocity polygons provide systematic graphical solutions:
For mechanisms with multiple links, Kennedy’s Theorem helps locate all instantaneous centers:
🔍 Kennedy's Theorem
Statement: For three bodies in relative motion, their three instantaneous centers lie on a straight line.
Application Process:
Powerful Result: Enables systematic analysis of complex multi-link mechanisms
Mechanical advantage can be determined using velocity relationships:
This relationship is crucial for:
Stroke-to-Bore Ratio
Impact on Velocity:
Connecting Rod Length
L/R Ratio Effects:
Engine Balance
Primary Forces: Cancelled by counterweights Secondary Forces: Reduced by optimized L/R ratio Design Goal: Minimize vibration transmission
Performance Tuning
Power Band: Optimize for desired RPM range Fuel Efficiency: Balance velocity profiles with combustion Emissions: Control mixing and burn rates
Reciprocating Compressor Optimization:
Flow Rate Control
Efficiency Maximization
Vibration Minimization
Durability Design
MATLAB/Simulink:
Mathematica/Maple:
SolidWorks Motion:
Autodesk Inventor:
Adams/MSC:
Working Model:
Python Example for Crank-Slider Analysis:
import numpy as npimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def crank_slider_velocity(theta, r, l, omega): """Calculate piston velocity for crank-slider mechanism""" phi = np.arcsin((r/l) * np.sin(theta)) v_piston = -r * omega * (np.sin(theta) + (r * np.sin(theta) * np.cos(theta)) / (l * np.cos(phi))) return v_piston
# Engine parametersr = 0.045 # crank radius (m)l = 0.135 # connecting rod length (m)omega = 628.3 # angular velocity (rad/s)
# Calculate velocity profiletheta = np.linspace(0, 4*np.pi, 1000)v_piston = crank_slider_velocity(theta, r, l, omega)
# Plot resultsplt.plot(theta*180/np.pi, v_piston)plt.xlabel('Crank Angle (degrees)')plt.ylabel('Piston Velocity (m/s)')plt.title('Crank-Slider Velocity Profile')Velocity Optimization
Goal: Match velocity profiles to application requirements Method: Parametric analysis of link geometry Validation: Prototype testing and refinement
Balance Considerations
Challenge: High velocities create dynamic forces Solution: Systematic balancing analysis Tools: Counterweights, multiple cylinder arrangements
Mechanical Advantage
Analysis: Use velocity ratios to predict force ratios Design: Optimize for required force/speed characteristics Integration: Consider actuator capabilities and control
System Integration
Consideration: Velocity affects entire system design Impact: Bearings, lubrication, control systems Approach: Holistic system-level optimization
Automotive Engines:
Industrial Compressors:
Manufacturing Equipment:
Coming Next: In Lesson 4, we’ll extend our analysis to acceleration and dynamic forces in Geneva mechanism indexing systems, essential for understanding inertial loading and vibration control in automated machinery.
Comments